Jon Bell

on June 25, 2009

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Creative collaboration.

Writing – at least in creative fields – has almost always been an individual effort. The writer works alone.

In the world of advertising, like no other creative undertaking I can think of, collaboration usually happens right from the start. The client and account team have collaborated on the strategy – and when it’s time to hand the project to the creative team, you get a writer and an art director.

Maybe this is because advertising was never just about the copy.  The first ads (of the modern era) were posters – and a big part of the job was to get attention. Design is all about grabbing attention.

Direct marketing always was more about copy than general advertising was. It just takes more words to get a sale than to get awareness.

Why is collaboration a good idea?

1. As a creative person, I have to confess that working with an art director takes off some of the pressure. If we don’t come up with brilliance, at least there’s someone to help share the blame.
2. It’s faster to get to good ideas when I brainstorm with someone than when I go it alone.
3. The “words and music” have to work with each other. I may come up with marketing ideas the art director can’t execute. It’s better to figure that out before I present my work to the creative director or the account team or, worst of all, the client.

What make creative collaboration difficult?

1. When I like my idea and my teammate doesn’t, it takes effort to persuade him.
2. The more editors on an idea, the muddier it’s likely to become. Just like overworking a pie crust, you can roll the air out of concepts until they become chewy, not flaky.
3. I got into writing partly because I’m an introvert. Art directors sometimes suck the energy out of me.

These two lists are awfully personal, and not exactly comprehensive. But, to motivate myself to collaborate, I have to look at my own reasons for inspiration and see how ridiculous my “difficult” list really is.

Do you love or hate creative collaboration? What benefits have I forgotten?

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on February 10, 2009

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

The world revolves around me.

You are reading this because it’s about me and my achievements. Nothing could be more fascinating. I’ll be giving you the details about all the awards I’ve won and my new work that just launched.

And when you’ve read all of this, I know you’ll be delighted to learn that you can bask in my reflected glory when you hire my agency.

This was the gist of an email I received this morning. I exaggerate -- but only a little.

I admire the self-confidence of this copywriter. I do. What must it be like to go through life with that golden glow?

But I would never hire him or his agency.

Copy Rule #1: The safe assumption is they don’t know about you or your product and they don’t care.

If you really want to fascinate people, either ask questions so they can talk about themselves or talk about what’s important to them. It’s just like getting a prospect to buy your product or service.  Sell what you’ll do for them -- the lawn they’ll get, not the seed you’re selling.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on January 13, 2009

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Have a little respect.

I sometimes wonder if marketers have parents or grandparents. So many of us have no trouble talking down to seniors. Or making fun of them behind their backs.

Here’s a snarky little story in the Los Angeles Times, reporting on the Consumer Electronics Show:

Remember when Grandma and Grandpa were confounded by the VCR? Today’s senior citizens are surfing the Web, gabbing on cellphones, Skyping with grandkids and firing up the Wii game console.

When it comes to technology, older Americans have done a cultural reboot.

"They’re doing things that 80-year-olds weren’t doing 15 years ago," said Howard Byck, senior vice president for lifestyle products for AARP.

Excuse me? Did you have a Wii console 15 years ago, Mr. Smartypants? Were you Skyping anyone?

Fifteen years ago was when I bought my first cell phone. That’s also about when I opened my first home email account through AOL. I remember getting something called "Internet in a Box" in order to do it. There was barely a World Wide Web, and certainly no Skype.

What’s more, I recall a few 30-somethings having trouble setting the clock on their VCRs back in the day.

Of course, seniors are doing more technologically sophisticated things than they used to. So are the rest of us. There are also more seniors than there used to be. So the growth in sales to seniors may be more about a demographic bulge than a "cultural reboot."

Seniors deserve more thoughtful consideration than an "isn’t that cute" pat on the head. Marketers need to remember that seniors are a lot like the rest of us. When I’m writing for seniors, I keep real members of the target audience in mind – people like my scary Aunt Ida or Jack Nicholson or Toni Morrison.  Would you pat Hillary Clinton on the head?  Or talk down to Arnold Palmer?  Puh-leaze!

In fact, I respect seniors so much, I aspire to become one!

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on January 8, 2009

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Beautiful but dumb.

The Madison Avenue Journal has been doing an in-depth, multi-article interview of Keith Reinhard who deeply admired Bill Bernbach. The Journal has nicely presented Bernbach’s 20 insights on advertising. Number 9 struck me as just terrific:

I wouldn’t hesitate for a second to choose the plain looking ad that is alive and vital and meaningful, over the ad that is beautiful but dumb.

How many of us fall for the beautiful but dumb one in a creative presentation?

I have a bias. I’m a writer. So in my heart, "meaningful" has more to do with copy than art. But in reality, I know that vitality and even meaning can also be about touching the emotions through design or music. The beautiful ad can also be the very best.

Judging advertising in a conference room during a creative pitch is trickier than it sounds. You think, "I’d never pick the beautiful, dumb one." But it happens all the time. Fortunately, direct marketers have developed more humility than that. We’ve all fallen for the dumb one. Then we test it and discover the target audience completely disagrees.

I’m glad my career never depended on a "golden gut" or an ability to unfailingly pick winners. Instead, I’ve tried to learn what people respond to and put that vital and meaningful touch into every campaign.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on December 16, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Automated advertising.

It used to be a joke among creative types that when you show a client three different concepts, they’ll pick the headline from the first ad, the photo from the second and the copy from the third.

Then we’d shake our heads and laugh, go into a deep funk or rage, depending on our personality.

The last laugh is on us.

The New York Times has reported on a new technology that will create web ads on the fly "changing elements like color, type font, message, and image to see what combination draws clicks on a particular site or from a specific audience."

In theory, because I’m a direct marketer, this makes a certain amount of sense to me. I love testing. I love knowing what works. I even love being surprised by what works.

In practice, I can’t imagine this working very well at all.

Type fonts and colors are important, but they’re important only in context -- and they’re not important at all relative to many other things you could care about.

Images are attention-getters in the advertising world -- and a bigger deal than type and color -- but they’re not the whole story either.

Now, messaging . . . that gets closer to the point. That’s well worth testing and I don’t have any objection to testing as many ways to get the message across as you can think of. 

But the really BIG things to test are audience and offer. Audience and offer will make all the difference. The other stuff is so secondary, I wonder if these guys will even get a significant lift in their purple vs. orange tests.

Let’s see if these ad assembly systems are in wide use in a year or two. If they are, I’ll go into a deep funk or rage, depending on my mood.  If not, I’ll go about my business of crafting messages for specific audiences about specific offers.  And I’ll be doing it with a smile on my face. 

 

 

 

Comments:

12/17/2008 at 01:08 a.m.
The 40/40/20 Rule
Good points Jon. The generally accepted direct marketing rule is that 40% of a direct mail piece's effectiveness is supported by OFFER, another 40% is supported by AUDIENCE and the last 20% is supported by CREATIVE. Applying this rule to web-based messaging, the font or background color is only a fraction of that last 20%. While this new technology might lift reponse by some small fraction, logic says that at least as much thought should be going into technology that rotates/tests OFFERS and delivers messages to rotating AUDIENCES. Maybe instead of playing with fonts and colors they can use the same technology to rotate messaging, offers, and audience delivery?
>>Mark C., Seattle, WA12/16/2008 at 11:28 a.m.
A hammer does not a carpenter make...
...putting a pen to paper does not make one a good writer, and the ability to change an ad does make one an effective advertiser. This new tool may be nice for reducing the production cycle, but without the correct reasoning behind the decisions, people will not results they expect.
>>Dave, Seatttle WA

Jon Bell

on November 17, 2008

category: direct marketing

Senior Copywriter

Breakthrough insight: people like stuff

I like stuff a lot. And I like a lot of stuff. I imagine other people do, too. In fact, I’m pretty sure it was George Carlin who said that "home is where you keep your stuff, while you’re out getting other stuff."

Knowing that, it was hard to keep a straight face when I read in Adweek that a survey was needed to discover that people really like it when advertisers give them stuff. If the stuff has the advertiser’s name on it, people remember the advertiser. They may even buy something from said advertiser.

The icing on the gateau? The survey was done by the Advertising Specialty Institute. They’re an organization that helps bring advertisers and tchotchke vendors together. Not exactly the least biased of all sources.

It’s fun to mock them but, of course, they’re right. Marketers wouldn’t use these branded items if they didn’t measurably increase results. And if marketers didn’t use them so much, there’d be no need for an Advertising Specialty Institute.

One clarifying point. The best use of promotional swag is not to get the target market’s attention. That’s why "clever" agencies and advertisers don’t often go for the idea. And if they ever try, those agencies and advertisers rarely know how to make the swag work for them.

In direct marketing, we don’t give this stuff away without a plan. We call these items "offers" and we use them to get the action we desire from our target market -- from giving us their contact information to closing a sale.

Branded stuff, promotional swag, tchotchkes, offers . . . whatever you call it, it’s a direct marketer’s secret weapon. I’m not too worried that the secret is out. Most Adweek readers won’t understand.

 

Comments:

12/20/2008 at 4:02 p.m.
Great Affirmation
What a great article, I couldn't agree more. I am amazed everyday by the utter lack of understand of how powerful these items are. Both internally as well as externally. I know a gal at the local yellow pages that has every piece of swag the company has given her over the last 20 some years proudly displayed in her office. I especially like your comments about their use to promote action. Why just give swag away at a tradeshow, make the prospect earn it! Thanks for giving us tchotchke dealers a little kudos.
>>Steven Paul Matsumoto, Bellevue WA11/19/2008 at 3:58 p.m.
Ouch...
Nicely put.
>>Tara, Seattle WA

Jon Bell

on September 29, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

You don't have because you don't ask.

I regularly get busted for being too pushy.  In my marketing copy, not in real life.  In real life I’m a teddy bear.  Just look at my photo.  It’s obvious.

But, on behalf of clients, I’m a tiger.  When it comes to asking for a response, I go for the jugular immediately.  Sometimes clients think it’s a little too much -- but I beg to differ.

Too much advertising is mere mush.  It’s entertaining.  It’s funny.  It’s clever.  But it’s too shy to say, "So buy me, already!"

There’s no shame in saying, "Call now."  It shouldn’t embarrass you to say, "Find it at your favorite department store."  No one will be put off if you say, "To get this great offer, go to www.xyzxyz.com."  In fact, if you’ve done your job right, they should be chomping at the bit to get your great widgety-thing.

I learned long ago that a direct marketing appeal has a much greater chance of winning when you ask for a response as early as possible.  Even in a long-form medium, like direct mail, if you don’t ask for a reply on the first page, your letter is doomed to fail.

On the Web, you put the Get It Now button right at the top of the page.  You don’t let people wonder whether there’s a reason to click on your banner -- you give them a reason.

Same for emails.  Ask early.  Ask often.  Don’t worry about being obnoxious.  I never do.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on July 9, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Making your product more attractive.

The only way I know how to write compellingly about a client’s product is to fall in love with it, at least a little bit. Usually, this is easy. The old saying, "salesmen love to be sold," is true of advertising copywriters, too.

It’s a little like seeing another man enjoy the company of your wife at a cocktail party. That alone can make you appreciate her a little bit more. A prospect will often catch the excitement of the copywriter.(As long as the writing is totally credible -- which takes some balance.)

To fall in love with a product may take a little playacting. Why does the client love this product? By "the client," I mean the originator of this product. The product manager may not have a clue. Somebody had to be passionate about it -- or it never would have ended up on my desk.

And why will the buyer love this product? Some things are beyond my experience -- like the laboratory bench meters I once sold to scientists. When I figured out their capabilities, the tiny increments of difference they could measure -- and the incredible accuracy they promised -- I was completely in awe. I could talk about those fascinating objects all day.

Of course, I’ve forgotten every detail now -- including what it was those things measured. But I was definitely (though temporarily) in love at the time.

This kind of delight can’t be faked. As someone who reads creative briefs for a living, I know when the product manager is just going through the motions. I glance through the key messages and see that they’re flabby and lifeless. Bleh. They haven’t done their method acting exercises and gotten into the head of the person who will buy their product.

That’s when I get a little sad for those poor product managers. The excitement of falling in love is a big part of what makes the job of selling so enjoyable.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on July 3, 2008

category: direct marketing

Senior Copywriter

Consumer engagement.

So many marketers are still caught up in old school marketing, where the goal is to drive someone from unawareness to ''awareness'' and, finally, all the way to ''brand liking.''  Or something like that.  There may be an ''intent to buy'' after that.

A post on Advertising Age fine-tunes this a bit further.  Between liking and intent to purchase, there's something the author, Troy Young, calls an ''intent to engage.'' 

It makes measuring real leads and actual sales seem a little crude, doesn't it?  Being able to learn someone's intentions -- now that's refinement taken to hair-splitting, angels-dancing-on-a-pin extremes.

Direct marketers don't try to read minds the way general advertisers and other pseudo-psychics do.  I think the reason for that is that we know our own minds so well.  When I have to make a considered purchase, like a new home or a new car, I may dither right up until the last possible moment.  The length of time between intent to purchase and no intent at all and back again could move as quickly as the flutter of a butterfly's wings.

For something like an ice cream cone, I can go from unawareness to awareness to intent about as quickly as it took to me to see the Ben & Jerry's logo on the store.  Even though, up until that moment, I specifically and consciously had no intent to ever eat ice cream again as long as I lived.  And it doesn't mean I've engaged with either Ben or Jerry in the past.  It could be a local vendor in the town where I happen to be vacationing.

This is why direct marketers don't try to measure intentions.  Instead, we give the consumer plenty of reasons to purchase.  We try to connect them emotionally.  We urge them to respond sooner rather than later.  If they indicate interest, we call them a lead and nurture the budding relationship.  If they give us money, we call that transaction a sale.  We measure those.  And we respect their preference to keep any other intentions to themselves, if they wish. 

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on June 17, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Creative accounting.

I've worked in advertising and I've worked in direct marketing, and direct is better.

Seriously.  In direct marketing, we keep score.  That makes it all more fun.  When we keep score, we can often figure out what we did right and what we did wrong.  Then we can tweak what we do the next time and improve our score.

The only way to keep score in advertising is with awards. 

The Cannes Lions Advertising Festival is going on this week.  It's make or break for a lot of people right now.  I admit, I wouldn't mind a little field trip to the south of France.  But if it meant how good I felt about myself as a marketer for a full year, that might take a bit of the joy out of it.

I have no objection to competition.  I just like to compete every single time we run a campaign.  Besides, the people who judge our work are much more important than the judges at Cannes.  Our judges are the people who buy the products and services we sell.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on June 13, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Creative that takes a licking and keeps on ticking.

If you're someone who has to judge creative work before it hits the streets in its final form, I have a couple of hints for you.

1. The idea you hate most may work hardest. We have a saying around here that no one is soothed into buying a product.  Now that's one of those generalizations that can be easily disproven. Trying to agitate someone into taking a spa vacation would certainly be the wrong approach. However, if something surprises or jars you, it may also get your prospect's attention and response.

2. The idea that scares you may be the breakthrough you're looking for. A little controversy can be a wonderful thing. It gets you noticed. Those who agree with you see your brand as something they identify with even more powerfully. Those who disagree probably wouldn't have bought your product anyway. And their complaints could even get your brand some free publicity. People like brands that actually stand for something.

3. The idea that strikes you as perfect as soon as you see it may be exactly wrong. Some of those perfect concepts look just like your previous campaign -- or worse, just like your competition. The obvious is often boring. The joke everyone has already heard is worse than not funny, it makes you look like you're not paying attention.

You wouldn’t hire a consulting firm to put together a focus group with just one person in it.  If you find yourself beginning to function like a “focus group of one,” it’s time to pause and take a deep breath.  You don't need to make an immediate, emotional decision. You're the one with the veto power, so go ahead and sleep on it before giving your final opinion.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on June 3, 2008

category: integrated marketing

Senior Copywriter

Au contraire, Mr. Contrarian.

I just read a blog post by someone more curmudgeonly than I am.  The post is even called ''A Cranky, Skeptical Loudmouth Looks at Social Media Marketing.''  Delightful!  Wish I'd thought of that title.

I'm so cranky, I found something in this post I had to disagree with (although much of it made a lot of sense).  Let me quote Mr. Hoffman at length:

It’s hard to imagine a medium that could be more intrusive, wasteful, and inefficient than direct mail. But display is it.

The latest best figures I can find show that the response (click-through) rates on display ads on the web are less than two in a thousand. This is ridiculously small. It is almost 10 times smaller than direct mail. And remember, with direct mail in order to interact you have to tear off a post card, find a pen, fill out a card, walk to the mailbox and drop it in. With display ads, all you need to do is move your finger.

How can it be that display ads are so ineffective? Simple. We all trained our eyes to ignore banners ten years ago. Just like we trained our eyes to ignore small space newspaper ads.

When it became evident that display was a lousy response medium, those selling it to us changed their tune. Now it’s a branding medium. To this I can only say – yeah, right.

I, on the other hand can think of about a dozen media that are more intrusive, wasteful and inefficient than direct mail.  I mean just about all of them!

TV commercials aren't intrusive?  Then why do so many of us invest hundreds of dollars on VCRs, DVRs, TiVos and whatever else we can do to avoid them? 

They're efficient?  Come ON.  Are you serious?  Why -- on those occasions when I must watch live TV -- am I watching diaper commercials?  My diaper-buying days are long over.  No diaper direct mail is coming my way.  I also don’t eat fast food, nor do I plan to buy a car in the next several years.  Just about the only commercials that make any sense for me are the ones for TV programs like the one I'm watching now.

I can't disagree that we've trained our eyes to ignore banners.  I do disagree that we ignore small newspaper ads.  We now ignore newspapers, but we never ignored the ads.  I've sold many a used car through the classifieds, back in the day.  But, if I were selling one today, I'd go to Craigslist.  People still look at classifieds . . . but the newspaper is now online.

Let me also say that I agree with Mr. Hoffman's main premise, that most of us are passive when it comes to the Web.  I just don't think that's a big problem.  If all of us were active participants all the time . . . well, it makes me tired to think about it.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on May 22, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Why media trumps copy.

Whenever anything goes wrong with the results of a marketing test, you can count on me (as the copywriter) to say, It must have been the list.  Or, if it wasn't a mailing or email, Must have been poor audience targeting.

It's a joke to deflect blame from my bulletproof creative work.  Like all jokes, it's based on truth. 

You can bring the gospel to the infidels, but you can't make them believe.  You can make a great offer to someone who doesn't need your product, but you can't make her buy.

But wait.  There's more.

Better targeting also helps me, as the writer, more directly.  I need to get into the head of my target audience -- and having a clearer picture of that group can only make that easier.  So, who reads Beagles Unlimited Magazine?  (I wonder if the editors call it BUM?)  Who watches the Food Network?  Who searches for information on vacations in Croatia?

That's why we all count on our friends in the media department.  They make me look good.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on April 16, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Don't bury the lead!

I've gotten pretty far in the direct marketing biz by understanding the "what's in it for me" principle. My job is to get inside the head of someone else in order to figure out what they want. And then I climb back out again and show that person how my client gives them just what they're looking for. (As a friend of mine says, "Be careful. It's dark in there.")

The WIIFM idea works for headlines, copy leads, calls to action -- just about everything.

Sometimes this approach is lost in an effort to be more interesting or clever or just different. I've found that it's sometimes very hard to make a clever approach work. Not because people don't like cleverness -- they often enjoy it very much. But, more often, we creatives fall in love with an idea that isn't actually clever at all. In fact, sometimes it makes no sense, unless you have someone there explaining it. (That's why I'm a little suspicious of creative presentations to the client or account team that require a lot of set-up.)

Now, as the economy worsens, everything we do has to pay off and the work has to speak for itself.

My advice is to be sure your creative approach doesn't get in its own way. Keep coming back to the point -- and the point is always about how the reader benefits.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on March 21, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Quality of work

In my role as in-house curmudgeon, I often grumble about lax attitudes toward perfection. If something is worth doing, it's worth proofreading for the microscopic differences between a hyphen and an en-dash, I always say.

But then I have to remember, not everything will have an impact on response. Sometimes it's better to let it go. Especially if it's expensive to fix.

Better yet is using speed as part of your strategy.

When things can get done quickly, you can learn what works . . . fast. Then you can implement another round of testing -- sometimes before your competitor has figured out that you've gone through the first round.

I still prefer to work with people who enjoy futzing with the details. I just have to put a time limit on the tweaking or another part of the marketing strategy -- speed -- will break down.

And I insist that I retain my right to grumble.

 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on February 28, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Do you have a favorite word?

I have a friend whose favorite word is mélange. He says he likes any English word that's actually French. Bizarre.

If you're a marketer, I'll bet your favorite word is FREE. Or maybe YOU. Or sometimes GUARANTEE.

My favorite marketing word is a little tricky . . . and some clients don't let me use it.

It's I. (Or should I say "c'est moi," in honor of my Francophile friend?)

I is a great word for emails and letters. It makes them look like they were written by a real person. How many personal emails have you written that haven't used the word I?

Some clients don't want their marketing to be that informal. Or, they think it sounds less customer-focused. I get that. But, for me, it's the word WE that does that, not I. That's the corporate WE I'm talking about. If you can get one or two YOU AND I's in your letter, you've got a chance of creating a bond with the recipient.

Throwing in an I also can let you say things the lawyers don't like . . . such as, "I think this is the best thing going." It puts its own disclaimer on the superlative. You ought to be careful with the superlatives anyway — but if your claim is true, and you really, really want to say it, this is a good way to do it.

Perhaps un peu sneaky, but c'est la marketing!
 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on February 5, 2008

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Opinions are meaningless in business.

Here we are, a group of professional marketers, sitting around the day after the Super Bowl, talking about the commercials. Many of us have worked together for years. We think we know each other.

And then, KAPOW! You learn that someone else at the table — someone you respect — actually liked the boring Derek Jeter commercial for who-knows-what energy drink.

It came home to me again that we live in a world full of opinions. You can't depend on them. They're just so stupidly subjective. By which I mean they're not all the same as mine.

Around here, when we're talking about the work and someone has an opinion that can't be backed up by data, we call it "a focus group of one."

Opinions are meaningless. I won't go so far as to say they're worthless, because sometimes you don't have data and you need to go with your gut. But it's best to know that going in. That way you can be sure to test your ideas and learn something for the next time around.
 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on December 13, 2007

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Are you a pseudoneologist?

Maybe you heard that the word of the year is w00t. Word of the year, according to Merriam-Webster, that is.

If you, like me, aren't familiar with gamer terms, w00t — spelled with zeroes, rhymes with root — is what players of Dungeons and Dragons tabletop role-playing game say when they're happy. It originally meant "Wow, loot!" Now it means "yay!" (If this is about D&D, shouldn't it be the word of 1997?)

So why zeroes? It's easier to get to the zero than the "o" on a phone keypad. Duh.

My coworkers will tell you that I'm a pseudoneologist, that is, someone who makes up new words. Like "pseudoneologist." You can look it up ... but you won't find it.

Unlike "w00t," my made-up words tend to be more self-explanatory. When I say "I think we need to orange-ify this part of the ad," everyone knows that means to make it orangier. If I ask about uncrunchelating some copy, it's obvious I want to give it a little more space. Air it out. Freshen it up.

When I'm talking I make up words when I can't find the right one. When writing, I really am a word snob. The right word choices are important. Marketers can't afford to write copy that makes the reader guess ... or work too hard to get the meaning.

Remember, in advertising: design captures the attention, but copy is what sells. Then the client says, "Wow! Loot!"
 

Comments:

12/19/2007 at 6:52 p.m.
133t!
Hehe, close... "w00t" is a product of Leet, or Leetspeak. It's based on orthography, using substitutions of other characters, letters or otherwise, to represent a letter or letters in a word. It used to just be language used in the 80's on BBS or IRC for hackers or sysops to defeat text filters when talking about "naughty" topics, like hacking, or just for them to seem cooler than everyone else. Now it's in the mainstream, particularly on MMORPGs (for you noobs out there, that's Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Game.) Lolz!
>>Andi Blija, Bellevue WA

Jon Bell

on November 27, 2007

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

More conflict resolution

In my last post to this blog, I talked about how being open to disagreement can help get to a better solution.

Being open is all hunky-dory in those cases where you can tear yourself away from your own point of view long enough to appreciate another perspective. But sometimes you're absolutely certain you're right and the other person is wrong. And sometimes the other person feels just as passionately.

That's the brilliant thing about direct. We can always test it!

Just about any difference of opinion can be resolved in a matter of weeks with a small in-market test. Let the people decide whether the background should be green or blue, which headline is more intriguing, which price point brings the most profit.

We often find that just discussing the test will be enough to give everyone some perspective. A word choice issue in the fine print of lead capture Web site won't make or break a program. Even if I have the precise word for the job — and only the basely ignorant disagree with me.
 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on November 14, 2007

category: miscellaneous

Senior Copywriter

Conflict resolution.

Some people run from conflict. Others will tell you they love a good argument -- often because they take no prisoners and always win. They make the rest of us hate conflict.

I don't win every argument. Not by a long shot. And I despise compromise. But I don't hate disagreement.

In the creative world Hacker Group has built, conflict usually means my work is about to get better. Whenever a colleague disagrees with my point of view or dislikes the copy I've written, I figure I'm about to learn something. After all, I understand exactly what I meant when I wrote the words. But I don't know precisely how it reads to someone else. That's the information I get from disagreement.

Conflict does not necessarily imply compromise.
 

There are no comments for this post.

Jon Bell

on October 24, 2007

category: creative

Senior Copywriter

Using all the words we've got

"I don't swear for the hell of it. Language is a poor enough means of communication. We've got to use all the words we've got. Besides, there are damn few words anybody understands." - Clarence Darrow in Inherit the Wind.

Now there's a lawyer who should be reviewing direct marketing copy.

I'm not trying to fool anybody when I say something is free. It's free! But someone in legal thinks there are strings attached when I'm, say, giving away a white paper for answering a couple qualifying questions. They tell me to say it's "complimentary."

Then there's the disclaimer that needs to be written into the pitch. I'm not allowed to tell you that you'll save $250 on installation. No . . . I have to say: You'll pay $1,000 for installation - that's a $250 savings! - when you buy a $25,000 piece of equipment and sign a ten-year service agreement that costs $69 per month per user (minimum of 10 users, please), if you decide to buy before May 15, 2009 and you call our toll-free number when the moon is full.

Okay. Thanks. I guess I won't be mentioning the offer at all.

I just want a lawyer who will let me say what I mean.
 

Comments:

11/1/2007 at 6:50 p.m.

When you start measuring the disclaimer copy in inches, it doesn't strengthen your marketing efforts. But topping the list of my "Favorite Moments in Direct Marketing Legal" is a very short disclaimer: *FREE, without obligation When you have to add an asterisk every time you say FREE, it's frustrating. But when the asterisk points to a definition-- for those who may not be familiar with the term FREE-- well, that's just silly.
>>Meredith Steiner,